Doping Journal Logo


HOME ABOUT FEEDBACK RECENT CONTENT SUBJECT COLLECTIONS PUBLISH WITH US ARCHIVE IN DJ
HELP MENU

Doping Journal 7, 2 (2010)
find out how to cite this article

original research:
Effects of caffeine ingestion on strength and endurance performance of normal young adults

Sharma Archna, Sandhu S Jaspal 

Department of Sports Medicine and Physiotherapy, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India

Sharma Archna, Department of Sports Medicine and Physiotherapy, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India
email: archnaphyzio[at]yahoo.co.in

First Submitted: 30 March 2008 | Accepted: 25 October, 2010 | Revised published: 3 May, 2011

Copyright © 2010 by Sharma Archna and Sandhu S Jaspal, licensee The Doping Journal

Article view and respond options:

DOAJ GOOGLE SCHOLAR EMAIL2COLLEAGUE FULL TEXT ACROBAT .PDF XML (NIH DTD 2.0) ACCEPTED .DOC E-LETTERS SUBMIT E-LETTER RELATEDPUBMED

ARTICLE NAVIGATION MENU

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
FIGURE 1

ABSTRACT

There are a number of studies evaluating the effects of various dosages of caffeine on performance variables viz. isometric strength & endurance performance, but the effects of caffeine on exercise performance are controversial. There is paucity of conclusive evidence regarding the proposed ergogenic effects of caffeine. The purpose of this experimentation was to investigate whether caffeine (5mg/kg body weight) exerts an ergogenic effect on maximal force production and fatigue of human quadriceps muscle; as well as on the cardio-vascular endurance performance in 31 healthy students (17 male & 14 female), following one hour administration. Subjects ingested either a placebo or caffeine capsule following which peak force, average force and fatigue index of quadriceps and time to exhaustion were measured and compared with placebo. Post-exercise urine samples were obtained. A significant decrease in fatigue index of quadriceps (p=0.011) and significant increase in time to exhaustion (p=0.001) was observed for caffeine trial as compared to placebo. However, no significant increase in peak force (p=0.144) and average force (p=0.192) of quadriceps was observed for caffeine trial as compared to placebo. Mean urinary caffeine concentrations were 2.80±2.21, 4.79±2.11 and 3.55±2.57 μg/ml for 1st, 2nd and 6th hour post-exercise respectively, which is below caffeine dope limit. In conclusion, caffeine (5mg/kg BW) has an ergogenic effect on isometric muscular endurance and cardio-vascular endurance but not on maximal force generating capacity of the human quadriceps muscle.


Key words: Caffeine, force, fatigue index, exhaustion and urinary caffeine

INTRODUCTION

In current day highly competitive sports environment, with surmountable pressure to perform, once the athlete reaches optimal level of performance according to its genetic makeup and after inputs to the maximum by scientific training procedures, biomechanical inputs, dietary modulation, psychological support, the subsequent increment in performance is to a big extent based on various ergogenic procedures followed by elite sportspersons as even a small enhancement in energy delivery system gives them a “winning edge”. Of the various ergogenic methods used by sportspersons to achieve athletic excellence caffeine consumption has become increasingly popular. Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine), the world’s most popular stimulant drug, is a plant alkaloid found in coffee, tea, cola drinks, diet pills and cold medicines. Following absorption caffeine and its metabolites readily cross the blood-brain-barrier to produce analgesic effects on the CNS. Caffeine is equally distributed in intracellular fluid in the body [1] thus affecting the nervous, cardio-vascular and musculoskeletal systems. The caffeine content of a 6 ounce cup of brewed coffee varies from 77-150 mg [2].

Caffeine's ergogenic effects on neuro-muscular performance variables viz. strength and endurance are mediated by enhanced neuronal excitability thus facilitating motor unit recruitment. Various mechanisms postulated by which caffeine exerts its ergogenic effects is by (a) centrally antagonizing adenosine receptor system [3]; (b) reversing dopaminergic and cholinergic deficiencies; (c) lowering threshold for motor unit recruitment; (d) altering excitation contraction coupling (e) facilitating nerve impulse transmission and; (f) increased ion transport within the muscle which can reduce perception of effort and thus increase the work output.

It seems reasonable that caffeine is on the watch list of doping of International Olympic Committee (IOC) with maximum permissible urinary concentration for caffeine by World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is 12 µg/ml. Since 2004, caffeine has been included in WADA’s Monitoring program (this program includes substances which are not prohibited in sport, but which WADA monitors in order to detect patterns of misuse in sports)
[4].

There is ample laboratory based documentation which supports the hypothesis that caffeine increases both strength
[5, 6] and endurance performance [7, 8], but not all [9, 10], of the research reported. However, variability in experimental design, dosage, mode of administration and subject selection makes interpretation of these results difficult. In spite of substantial documentation supporting caffeine’s ergogenic effects on performance, there remains paucity of conclusive evidence regarding the effect of caffeine on both strength and endurance.

The purpose of the research is threefold Primary Objective: To test the hypothesis that relative to placebo caffeine (5mg/kg BW) would exert an ergogenic effect on maximal force production and endurance of human quadriceps muscle (PART A); On cardio-respiratory endurance performance (VO2max) (PART B) and; Secondary Objective: To determine the urinary caffeine concentration post-exercise in order to observe whether 5mg/kg BW caffeine consumption can lead to positive dope test limit of 12μg/ml (PART C).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SUBJECTS

31 (17 male and 14 female) apparently healthy university students with sedentary lifestyle (mean weight 63.0±2.9 kg, height 166.80±9.84 and age 24±2.25) reporting caffeine intake of ≤200 mg/week participated in the study [11]. Prior caffeine habits were also taken into consideration, as acute and habitual intake of caffeine causes diminished rise in epinephrine [12] and dampening of up-regulation of adenosine receptors, respectively. However, these responses get potentiated after 4 days of withdrawal. All subjects abstained from caffeinated substances for a minimum of 5 days prior to each experimental trial.

Subjects were weighed in minimal clothing, using a digital load cell balance (Soehnle, West Germany), which has precision of 0.1 kg. The height of the subjects were recorded, without footwear using a vertically mobile scale (Holtain, Crymych UK) and expressed to nearest 0.1 cm. Each subject read and signed an informed consent document outlining the experimental protocol and potential risks of the study. The study was approved by the local medical ethical committee.


INSTRUCTIONS TO SUBJECTS

The subjects were asked to refrain from any strenuous activity before the test. Pre-structured standardized diet was given before each testing protocol to maintain almost identical glycogen concentration in muscles and liver cells.

PRE-EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL


Subjects were familiarized with both the equipments and the test procedures itself to minimize anxiety. All the tests were performed under similar environmental condition (21-240C, 45-55 % relative humidity) and were free of significant external distraction.

Part A:

The HUR 5340 Leg Extension/Curl computer controlled machine was used for evaluating the isometric angle specific peak force, average force and fatigue index. Each subject visited the laboratory before the start of the actual study and performed 2 maximum voluntary isometric contractions with 10 second and 60 second hold on the dynamometer with a rest period of 2 minute in between the two contractions, to determine peak force (PF), average force (AVF) and fatigue index (FI) of the quadriceps muscle of the dominant leg measured at optimal standardized angle of knee joint (for which the quadriceps muscle applies maximal torque i.e. 60° of knee flexion; 0° means full knee extension) after Norkin et al. [13]. These constituted the baseline readings of the control trial.

Part B:

Each subject performed an incremental VO2max test (Ramp 20 Protocol) on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (Corival Lode, Gronigen, The Netherlands) [14]. Expired gas samples were analyzed every 15 seconds for fractions of O2 and CO2 with an online system (Computer controlled Vista Turbo Trainer machine, Vacumed, CA, U.S.A, Software – Turbofit version – 5.04) and pedal cadence was kept between 60-85 rpm (revolutions per minute) to determine the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and maximal power output (Wattage maximum, Wmax). The test was ended when pedaling frequency was lower than 50 rpm. On subsequent day the subjects pedaled at their respective workload 65 % peak VO2 until exhaustion (maximal endurance test) and time to exhaustion Tlim (minutes) was measured which constituted the baseline readings of Tlim of the control trial [15].


EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL

The study utilized a pre test-post test repeated measure, experimental design with control, placebo and caffeine trials completed in a random order on 3 separate days, with 1 week interval in between all 3 tests and with constant time and day of the week for each individual. Besides a placebo that contained all purpose flour and no caffeine (0 mg/kg BW), the dosage of caffeine tested was 5 mg/kg BW. Placebo and standardized caffeine capsules were administered using a double blind procedure in which an individual who was involved in neither data collection nor analysis placed capsules in code envelopes, which were identified by the subject’s initials and the day they were to be used. US Pharmacopoeia grade caffeine (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, USA) was used in the study.

Subjects were asked to consume food 2 hours prior to the test. After capsule ingestion the subjects rested for one hour. The caffeine trials were performed 1 hour post caffeine ingestion as peak concentrations are evident one hour post ingestion [16].

PART A:

Following a 5 min warm-up for the quadriceps, the PF, AVF and FI were measured at optimal standardized angle of the knee joint using the isometric test protocol as per standardized procedure mentioned by HUR research line software user manual (Version 1.3).

PART B:

Following unloaded pedaling on cycle ergometer for 2 minutes the subjects pedaled until exhaustion at workload 65 % peak VO2 (maximal endurance test) to measure Tlim among the caffeine and placebo trials.

PART C:

Randomly 12 subjects were selected and were instructed to give urine samples immediately before and at 1st hr, 2nd hr and 6th hr postexercise to evaluate the urinary caffeine concentration following caffeine ingestion. Urine samples were immediately stored at -200C in liquid nitrogen until further analysis. Caffeine concentration in urine was determined using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method (Hewlett Packard 1100 series, The Dope Control Centre, Sports Authority of India, ISO/IEC 17025:1999) [8, 17].
 

ANALYSIS: ISOMETRIC STRENGTH MEASUREMENT

The torque (Nm) was measured at 10 second isometric hold at 600 knee flexion for quadriceps in all the 3 groups. It was normalized to force (N) by dividing the torque (Nm) by lever arm length (m). Thereafter, Peak Force (PF) and Average Force (AVF) for 10 second were calculated (AVF of 4 quarters; 1 quarter=2.5 sec).

ISOMETRIC ENDURANCE MEASUREMENT


After 2 minute rest with no activity, fatigue index (FI) was calculated as a measure of isometric endurance with the same seat position and knee angle as above. Isometric hold of 60 second was performed, to calculate isometric endurance. Torque in 1st sec (T1) and torque at 60th sec (T60) were observed. Torque T1 and T60 was normalized to force F1 and F60 respectively. Fatigue Index designed by Milner and Brown et al. [18] was calculated using the formula:

Fatigue – index =  (F1 – F60)/F1 x 100 (%)

No visual or auditory cues were given to subjects to prevent psychological abrasions.

TIME TO EXHAUSTION (MINUTES)

Time to exhaustion (minutes): After one minute rest, sitting on the cycle ergometer the test was started with unloaded pedaling for 2 minutes then workload was kept constant at 65% peak VO2 (ml-1.kg-1.min-1) respectively for each subject until exhaustion [7, 14]. Tlim was measured among the caffeine and placebo trials.

 
DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICS

Data were presented as Mean ± SD. The data were analyzed for statistical significance by using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS 14.0) software. The dependent variables PF, AVF, FI and Tlim were analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for statistical analysis of the control, placebo and caffeine trials. Since significant differences were found (p<0.05) multiple comparison Scheffe’s (Post Hoc Test) was applied to test for differences between control, placebo and caffeine trials


RESULTS

Isometric strength (PF and AVF) was examined by a 10 second isometric hold of the dominant quadriceps femoris muscle. One Way ANOVA showed a non-significant increment in peak force (F=2.580, p=0.082). When intra-groups comparison was done caffeine trial demonstrated a non-significant increase of 22.41% (p=0.144) and 17.91% (p=0.144) as compared with control and placebo respectively, as shown in Figure 1.




FIGURE 1

Distribution of Mean values of Peak Force with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine


Archna and Jaspal. Doping J Vol.7, 2 - Figure 1. Distribution of Mean values of Peak Force with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine

Note: you may need to resize your browser window for better view of Figure 1




Analogous inferences can be drawn with One Way ANOVA when the average force was taken into consideration, with (F=2.811, p=0.066). When intra-groups comparison was done caffeine trial demonstrated a non-significant increase of 25.53% (p=0.089) and 20.90% (p=0.192) as compared with control and placebo respectively, as shown in Figure 2.



FIGURE 2

Distribution of Mean values of Average Force with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine

Archna and Jaspal. Doping J Vol.7, 2 - Figure 2. Distribution of Mean values of Average Force with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine

Note: you may need to resize your browser window for better view of Figure 2




The fatigue index was examined by a 60 second isometric hold of the dominant quadriceps femoris muscle. One Way ANOVA demonstrated significant results with respect to fatigue index (F=5.580, p=0.005). There was a highly significant decrease in fatigue index by 36.95% (p=0.033) and 41.23% (p=0.011) when caffeine trial was compared with control and placebo respectively (Figure 3).



FIGURE 3

Distribution of Mean values of Fatigue index with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine

Archna and Jaspal. Doping J Vol.7, 2 - Figure 3. Distribution of Mean values of Fatigue index with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine


Note: you may need to resize your browser window for better view of Figures




Time to exhaustion (Tlim) differed significantly among the caffeine and placebo tests. The endurance performance demonstrated stimulating effect of caffeine on cycling time (min) (F=13.188, p=0.001) with an increase of 49.47% and 45.53% as compared with caffeine trial and placebo, respectively implying that caffeine at dose of 5mg/kgBW of caffeine is capable of enhancing cycling endurance performance (Figure 4).




FIGURE 4

Distribution of Mean values of Time to Exhaustion with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine

Archna and Jaspal. Doping J Vol.7, 2 - Figure 4. Distribution of Mean values of  Time to Exhaustion with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine


Note: you may need to resize your browser window for better view of Figures




After intake of 5 mg/kg BW caffeine, the levels of caffeine in urine were observed below 12 μg/ml for each subject, with the mean urinary caffeine concentration immediately before and at 1st, 2nd and 6th hour postexercise were equivalent to 0, 2.80±2.21, 4.79±2.11 and 3.55±2.57 (μg/ml) respectively, (Figure 5)
.



FIGURE 5

Distribution of Mean values of Urinary Caffeine concentration following 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine ingestion

Archna and Jaspal. Doping J Vol.7, 2 - Figure 5. Distribution of Mean values of Urinary Caffeine concentration following 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine ingestion


Note: you may need to resize your browser window for better view of Figures



DISCUSSION


The present research was conducted to examine whether caffeine has ergogenic effect on performance variables of strength and endurance as previous studies had demonstrated equivocal results. From the present study it can be inferred that caffeine (5 mg/kg BW) has an ergogenic effect on isometric muscular endurance and cardio-vascular endurance but not on maximal force generating capacity of the human quadriceps muscle.

EFFECT OF CAFFEINE ON ISOMETRIC STRENGTH

Examining the effect of 5 mg/kg BW caffeine on peak force and average force results indicate that caffeine lead to a non-significant increase in both peak force and average force. Hence, it can be inferred that caffeine causes non-significant increments in isometric strength performance. Our results replicate previous findings by Bond et al. [19] who demonstrated non-significant differences in measures of peak torque and power at the varying contracting velocities following 5 mg/kg BW caffeine. James et al. [20] also demonstrated that treatment with 70 μM caffeine had no significant effect on force, work or power output of the Extensor Digitorum Longus (EDL) or soleus muscles. Further, Bugyi [21] suggested that maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was not affected by the administration of caffeine. Furthermore, James et al. [20] and Williams et al. [22] investigated effect of 7 mg/kg BW of caffeine and found no significant effect on force output. On the contrary, Plaskett and Cafarelli [23] reported significant increase in force output following ingestion of 6 mg/kg BW of caffeine.

The non-significant increase in isometric strength can be attributed to following three mechanisms which have been postulated as possible explanation of the potential ergogenic effects of caffeine on isometric strength at the cellular level:

(a) Caffeine mobilizes and increases release of intracellular Ca2+ from sarcolpasmic recticulum24, 25, but since plasma concentrations of caffeine must be very high for Ca2+ translocation to be observed in situ, it is unlikely that this mechanism is solely responsible for the physiological effects of caffeine;

(b) Inhibition of phosphodiesterase by caffeine leading to a subsequent increase in cyclic-3’,5’-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the various body tissues [26, 27] however, this only occurs when plasma caffeine concentrations reach pharmacological millimolar (mM) ranges that are toxic to humans and;

(c) The antagonistic effect of caffeine at adenosine receptors (which, inhibits neurotransmitter release primarily dopamine and acetylcholine, depresses spontaneous and evoked potentials and decreases neuronal firing rates [28], mainly in the CNS thus increasing descending drive from the motor cortex, consequently increasing a subject’s ability to excite a motor unit pool.

EFFECT OF CAFFEINE ON ISOMETRIC ENDURANCE

The study also investigated effects of caffeine on Isometric endurance and statistically significant ergogenic effect of caffeine on fatigue was observed for the caffeine trial. The findings of our study are in consistence with the findings of Meyers and Cafarelli [29] who demonstrated that caffeine ingestion (6 mg/kg) significantly increases time to fatigue during submaximal isometric contractions (50 % maximal voluntary contractions of human quadriceps). They observed that caffeine increases the time to fatigue by effecting calcium reuptake and maintaining twitch force and not by altering the firing rates during submaximal isometric contractions. James et al. [20] reported significant increase in Force, work, and power output during shortening after treatment with 10 mM caffeine on isolated mouse extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus muscles in vitro during recovery from fatigue. Plaskett and Cafarelli [23] reported that 6mg/kg BW caffeine increased endurance of submaximal isometric contractions of the quadriceps and inferred that since caffeine did increase the ability to activate motor units voluntarily, it appears that the increase in excitability occurs supraspinally. Also, Kalmer and Cafarelli [30] investigating the effect of 6 mg/kg BW caffeine on muscular endurance found that fatigue was significantly delayed in submaximal contractions of quadriceps and suggested that caffeine increases maximal voluntary activation at a supraspinal level enabling subjects to produce maximal voluntary output with maximal effort. On the contrary, Williams et al. [31] found that handgrip did not increase after the administration of 7 mg/kg BW caffeine. Lopes et al. [32] found that three off their five subjects non-significantly increased endurance time of sustained contraction of adductor pollicis after ingestion of 500 mg of caffeine; reporting a mean increase in endurance time of 12 % in the caffeine trial.

Possible explanations for these findings was attributed to caffeine’s adenosine-receptor antagonism, which may increase the firing rates of central neurons, but the study conducted Kalmer and Cafarelli [30] failed to demonstrate any significant alterations in firing rates of motor units recorded during submaximal voluntary contractions of quadriceps following 6 mg/kg BW caffeine administration. Release of Ca2+ from sarcolpasmic recticulum [33, 34] and inhibition of calcium uptake by sarcolpasmic recticulum could possibly explain caffeine’s ergogenic effect on muscular endurance. Direct effects of caffeine on muscle include potentiating the tension of isolated muscle contraction by direct stimulation, both at rest and after fatigue [35, 36, 37]. Caffeine also increases production of plasma catecholamines that allow the body to adapt to the stress as a result of physical exercise [38, 39] and also increase the availability of free fatty acids as muscle substrates during work, thus allowing glycogen sparing [40]. Caffeine by attenuating exercise sensory processes enhance isometric endurance performance [33, 41] and a hypoalgesic effect of caffeine has been observed during ischaemic muscle contraction [42] which too may contribute to delay of fatigue (perception of discomfort during fatigue).

EFFECT OF CAFFEINE ON CARDIO-RESPIRATORY ENDURANCE

In the present study caffeine trial, time to exhaustion demonstrated a significant increase of 49.47 % and 45.53 % as compared with control and placebo trials, respectively implying that caffeine at dose of 5 mg/kgBW of caffeine is capable of enhancing cycling endurance performance. Study by Graham and Spriet [43] reported increase in endurance time after 9 mg/kg BW caffeine ingestion during running. Additionally, Cole [39] found that 6 mg/kg BW caffeine significantly increased total work performed during the caffeine trials in comparison with placebo trials suggesting that caffeine may play an ergogenic role in exercise performance by altering both neural perception of effort and substrate availability. Improvement in performance after absorption of caffeine observed in prolonged exercise involving aerobic metabolism has been attributed to stimulation of lipolysis. Hydrolysis of triglycerides of adipose tissue increases blood concentration of free fatty acids [42]. Furthermore, the increase in endurance performance after caffeine ingestion is thought to be caused by enhanced fat oxidation41 which delays glycogen depletion and fatigue. A simultaneous down regulation of carbohydrate metabolism could result in glycogen sparing which was also demonstrated by Spriet and coworkers [43].

URINE CAFFEINE CONCENTRATION

The results of the present study demonstrate that the urine caffeine concentration following ingestion of 5 mg/kg BW caffeine observed at 1st hour, 2nd hour and 6th hour post-exercise were well below the caffeine dope limit of 12 µg/ml for all the 12 subjects sampled. This is in agreement with the study conducted by Pasman et al. [8] who reported that the mean urinary concentration for the 5 mg/kg BW dose was 4.8±1.8 µg/ml, 15 minutes after finishing the cycling exercise. The differences in the time (post-capsule ingestion) at which the samples are collected might affect the amount of caffeine being measured in urine. Acute and chronic exercise has been reported to alter pharmacokinetics of caffeine. However, it has been observed that sports activity does not seem to have any consequence on the absorption, distribution, metabolism and urinary elimination of caffeine [45].

CONCLUSION


In conclusion, caffeine exerts an ergogenic effect only on isometric muscle endurance and cardio-respiratory endurance but has no effect on maximum voluntary isometric strength. The peak force, average force increased by 17.91 % and 20.90 % respectively, but this was not statistically significant. Fatigue index decreased (implying that time to exhaustion increased) significantly by 41.23 % and 45.53 % for the (5 mg/kgBW) caffeine trial in comparison with placebo. Also, urine caffeine concentrations remained well below the caffeine dope limit of 12 μg/ml. Based on the present study it is concluded that athletes should take not more than 2-3 cups of coffee an hour before the competition to benefit from the ergogenic effect of caffeine on both isometric as well as cardio-respiratory endurance during endurance events.

 

REFERENCES
Please note: web enhanced references below provide no registration free access to documents

1. Arnaud MJ (1987). The pharmacology of caffeine. Prog Drug Res 31: 273-313 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

2. Griffiths RR, Juliano LM, Chausmer A. (2003). Caffeine: Pharmacology and Clinical Effects. In: Graham AW, Schultz TK, Mayo-Smith MF, Ries RK, Wilford BB, editors. Principles of Addiction Medicine. 3. American Society of Addiction Medicine; pp. 193–224 [ Back2Text ].

3. Bigland-Ritchie B, Furbush F, Woods JJ. (1986). Fatigue of intermittent submaximal voluntary contractions: central and peripheral factors. J Appl Physiol 61 (2): 421-429 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

4. World Anti Doping Agency. The world anti doping code. The monitoring program. 2009 [ URL ][ Back2Text ].

5. Woolf K, Bidwell WK, Carlson AG. (2008). The effect of caffeine as an ergogenic aid in anaerobic exercise. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab.  Aug; 18(4):412-29 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

6. Sharma A, Sandhu JS. (2008). The effect of different dosages of caffeine on isometric strength & isometric endurance. Journal of Exercise Physiology online. 11(6): 34–43 [ .DOC ][ Back2Text ].

7. Laurent D, Schneider KE, Prusaczyk WK, Franklin C, Vogel SM, Krssak M, Petersen KF, Goforth HW, Shulman GI. (2000). Effects of caffeine on muscle glycogen utilization and the neuroendocrine axis during exercise. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.;85:2170–75 [ .PDF ][ Back2Text ].

8.  Pasman WJ, van Baak MA, Jeukendrup AE, De Haan A. (1995). The effect of different dosages of caffeine on endurance performance time. Int J Sports Med 16(4): 225-230 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ]

9. Hunter AM, St Clair Gibson A, Collins M, Lambert M, Noakes TD. (2002). Caffeine ingestion does not alter performance during a 100-km cycling time-trial performance. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. Dec;12(4):438-52 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

10. Perkins R, Williams MH. (1975). Effect of caffeine upon maximal muscular endurance of females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 7(3):  221-224 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

11. Kalmar JM, Cafarelli E. (1999). Effects of caffeine on neuromuscular function. J Appl Physiol. 87:801–808 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

12. Bangsbo J, Jacobsen K, Nordberg N, Christensen NJ, Graham T. (1992). Acute and habitual caffeine ingestion and metabolic responses to steady state exercise. J Appl Physiol 72 (4): 1297-1303 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

13. Norkin CC, Levangie PK. Joint Structure and function. A comprehensive analysis. 3rd Edition. F.A. Davis Company. pp 351. (Book) [ Back2Text ].

14. Davis JA, Cohipp BJ, Lamarran, Huntsman DJ, Frank MH and Wasserman. (1982). Effect of ramp slope on measurement of aerobic parameters from the ramp exercise test. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 339-343 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

15. Hogervorst E, Bandelow S, Schmitt J, Jentjens R, Oliveira M, Allgrove J, Carter T, Gleeson M. (2008). Caffeine improves physical and cognitive performance during exhaustive exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:1841–1851
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

16. Harland B. (2000) Caffeine and nutrition. Nutrition.;16:522–526 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

17. Abu-Qare AW, Abou-Donia MB. (2001). A validated HPLC method for the determination of pyridostigmine bromide, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid and caffeine in rat plasma and urine. J Pharm Biomed Anal.  Dec; 26(5-6):939-947 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

18. Milner-Brown HS, Mellenthin, M. and Miller R. G. (1986). Quantifying human muscle strength, endurance and fatigue. Arch Phy Med Rehabil 67 (8): 530-535 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

19. Bond V, Gresham K, MacRae J, Tearney R J (1986). Caffeine ingestion and isokinetic strength. Br J Sports Med 20(3): 135-137 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

20. James RS, Wilson RS, Askew GN. (2004). Effects of caffeine on mouse skeletal muscle power output during recovery from fatigue. J Appl Physiol 96 (2): 545-552 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

21. Bugyi GJ. (1980). The effects of moderate doses of caffeine on fatigue parameters of the flexor forearm muscles. Am Correct Ther J 34 (2): 49-53. [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

22. Williams JH, Signorile JF, Barnes WS, Henrich TW. (1988). Caffeine, maximal power output and fatigue. Br J Sports Med 22(4): 132-134 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

23. Plaskett CJ and Cafarelli E. (2001). Caffeine increases endurance and attenuates force sensation during submaximal isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 91(4): 1535-1544 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

24. Binachi P. (1975). Cellular pharmacology of contraction of skeletal muscle. In: Cellular pharmacology of excitable tissues, Charles, C. T., Springfield, 485-519 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

25. Stephenson GD, Williams DA. (1981). Calcium activated force responses in fast- and slow- twitch skinned muscle fibers of the rat at different temperatures. J Physiol 317: 281-302
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

26. Butcher RW, Sutherland EW. (1962). Adenosine 3’-5’-monophosphate in biological materials. I: Purification and properties of 3’-5’-nucleotide phosphodiestrase and the use of this enzyme to characterize adenosine 3’-5’-phosphate in human urine. J Biol Chem 237: 1244-1250 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

27. Beavo JA, Rogers NL, Crofford OB, Hardmen JG, Sutherland EW, Newman EV. (1970). Effect of xanthine derivatives on lipolysis and on adenosine 3,5-monophosphate phosphodiesterase activity. Molec Pharmacol 6:597-603 [ URL ][ Back2Text ].

28. Nehlig A, Daval JL, Debry G. (1992). Caffeine and the central nervous system: mechanisms of action, biochemical, metabolic and psychostimulant effects. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 17(2): 139-170 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

29. Meyers BM, Cafarelli E. (2005). Caffeine increases time to fatigue by maintaining force and not by altering firing rates during submaximal isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 99(3): 1056-1063 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

30. Williams JH, Barnes WS, Gadberry WL. (1987). Influence of caffeine on force and EMG in rested and fatigued muscle. Am J Phys Med 66(4): 169-183 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

31. Lopes JM, Aubier M, Jardim J, Aranda JV, Macklem PT. (1983). Effect of caffeine on skeletal muscle function before and after fatigue. J Appl Physiol 54(5): 1303-1305 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

32. Binachi P. (1961). The effect of caffeine on radio calcium movement in frog sartorious. J Gen Physiology 44: 845-858 [ URL ][ Back2Text ].

33. Fryer MW, Neering IR. (1989). Actions of caffeine on fast and slow twitch muscles of the rat. J Physiol 416: 435-454 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

34. Connett RJ, Ugol LM, Hammack MJ, Hayes ET. (1983). Twitch potentiation and caffeine contractures in isolated rat soleus muscle. Comp Biochem Physiol 74(2): 349-354 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

35. Varagic VM, Zugic M. (1971). Interactions of xanthine derivatives, catecholamines and glucose-6-phosphate on the isolated phrenic nerve diaphragm preparation of the rat. Pharmacology 5(2): 275-286
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

36. Yamaguchi T. (1975). Caffeine induced potentiation of twitches in frog single muscle fiber. Jpn J Physiol 25(6): 693-704 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

37. Essig D, Costill DL, Van Handel PJ. (1980). Effects of caffeine ingestion on utilization of muscle glycogen and lipid during leg ergometer cycling. Int J Sports Med 1, 86-90.
As cited by: Pasman et al., 1995. The effect of different dosages of caffeine on endurance performance time. Int J Sports Med, Vol. 16, No. 4, 225-230 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

38. Fisher SM, McMurray RG, Berry M, Mar MH, Forsythe WA. (1986). Influence of caffeine on exercise performance in habitual caffeine users. Int J Sports Med 7 (5): 276-280 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

39. Mazzeo RS. (1991). Catecholamine responses to acute and chronic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23: 839-845 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

40. Cole KJ, Costill DL, Starling RD, Goodpaster BH, Trappe SW, Fink WJ. (1996). Effects of caffeine ingestion on perception of effort and subsequent work production. Int J Sports Nutr 6 (1): 14-23 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

41. Myers DE, Shaikh Z, Zullo TG. (1997). Hypoalgesic effect of caffeine in experimental ischaemic muscle contractions. Headache 31: 654-658 [ URL ][ Back2Text ].

42. Graham TE, Spriet LL. (1991). Performance and metabolic responses to a high caffeine dose during prolonged exercise. J Appl Physiol 71(6):2292-8 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

43. Bellet S, Kershbaum A, Finck EM. (1968). Response of free fatty acids to coffee and caffeine. Metabolism 17 (8): 702-707 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

44. Spriet LL, MacLean DA, Dyck DJ, Hultman E, Cederblad G, Graham TE. (1992). Caffeine ingestion and muscle metabolism during prolonged exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 262: E891-E898
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].

45. Van der Merwe PJ, Luus HG, Barnard JG. (1992). Caffeine in sport: Influence of endurance exercise on the urinary caffeine concentration. Int J Sports Med; 13: 74-76
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].



Bookmark this article!CLICK HERE OR PRESS <CTRL><D> TO BOOKMARK THIS ARTICLE  
This article should be cited in the following way:

S. Archna, S.S. Jaspal. Effects of caffeine ingestion on strength and endurance performance of normal young adults. The Doping Journal  Vol.  7, 2 (2010) Available at: http://dopingjournal.org/content/7/2/
( Please make sure you included article web address in your citation! )



HOME ABOUT FEEDBACK RECENT CONTENT SUBJECT COLLECTIONS PUBLISH WITH US
HELP MENU
Copyright© 2010+ by The Doping Journal (ISSN 1812-948x)   Doping Journal World Readership Map  DJ2008 article readers' access statistics by www.digits.com



Learn why Doping Journal serves AdWords ads by Google, and how one can be of help