original research:
Effects of caffeine ingestion
on strength and endurance performance of normal young adults
Sharma Archna, Sandhu S Jaspal
Department of Sports Medicine
and Physiotherapy, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India
Sharma Archna, Department of
Sports Medicine and Physiotherapy, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar,
India
email: archnaphyzio[at]yahoo.co.in
First Submitted: 30 March
2008
|
Accepted: 25 October,
2010 | Revised
published: 3 May,
2011
Copyright © 2010 by Sharma
Archna and Sandhu S Jaspal, licensee The Doping Journal
Article view and respond
options:
ARTICLE
NAVIGATION MENU
ABSTRACT
There
are a number of studies evaluating the effects of various dosages of
caffeine on performance variables viz. isometric strength &
endurance performance, but the effects of caffeine on exercise
performance are controversial. There is paucity of conclusive evidence
regarding the proposed ergogenic effects of caffeine. The purpose
of this experimentation was to investigate whether caffeine (5mg/kg
body
weight) exerts an ergogenic effect on maximal force production and
fatigue of human quadriceps muscle; as well as on the cardio-vascular
endurance performance in 31 healthy students (17 male & 14 female),
following one hour administration. Subjects ingested either a placebo
or caffeine capsule following which peak force, average force and
fatigue index of quadriceps and time to exhaustion were measured and
compared with placebo. Post-exercise urine samples were obtained. A
significant decrease in fatigue index of quadriceps (p=0.011) and
significant increase in time to exhaustion (p=0.001) was observed for
caffeine trial as compared to placebo. However, no significant increase
in peak force (p=0.144) and average force (p=0.192) of quadriceps was
observed for caffeine trial as compared to placebo. Mean urinary
caffeine concentrations were 2.80±2.21, 4.79±2.11 and
3.55±2.57 μg/ml for 1st, 2nd and 6th hour post-exercise
respectively, which is below caffeine dope limit. In conclusion,
caffeine (5mg/kg BW) has an ergogenic effect on isometric muscular
endurance and cardio-vascular endurance but not on maximal force
generating capacity of the human quadriceps muscle.
Key words: Caffeine, force, fatigue index, exhaustion and urinary
caffeine
INTRODUCTION
In current day highly competitive sports
environment, with surmountable pressure to perform, once the athlete
reaches optimal level of performance according to its genetic makeup
and after inputs to the maximum by scientific training procedures,
biomechanical inputs, dietary modulation, psychological support, the
subsequent increment in performance is to a big extent based on various
ergogenic procedures followed by elite sportspersons as even a small
enhancement in energy delivery system gives them a “winning edge”. Of
the various ergogenic methods used by sportspersons to achieve athletic
excellence caffeine
consumption has become increasingly popular. Caffeine
(1,3,7-trimethylxanthine), the world’s most popular stimulant drug, is
a plant alkaloid found in coffee, tea, cola drinks, diet pills and cold
medicines. Following absorption caffeine and its metabolites readily
cross the blood-brain-barrier to produce analgesic effects on the CNS.
Caffeine is equally distributed in intracellular fluid in the body [1] thus affecting the nervous,
cardio-vascular and musculoskeletal systems. The caffeine content of a
6 ounce cup of brewed coffee varies from 77-150 mg [2].
Caffeine's
ergogenic effects on neuro-muscular performance variables viz. strength
and endurance are mediated by enhanced neuronal excitability thus
facilitating motor unit recruitment. Various mechanisms postulated by
which caffeine exerts its ergogenic effects is by (a) centrally
antagonizing adenosine receptor system [3]; (b)
reversing dopaminergic and
cholinergic deficiencies; (c)
lowering threshold for motor unit
recruitment; (d) altering
excitation contraction coupling (e)
facilitating nerve impulse transmission and; (f) increased ion
transport within the muscle which can reduce perception of effort and
thus increase the work output.
It seems reasonable that caffeine is on the watch list of doping of
International Olympic Committee (IOC) with maximum permissible urinary
concentration for caffeine by World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is 12
µg/ml. Since 2004, caffeine has been included in
WADA’s Monitoring program (this program includes substances which are
not prohibited in sport, but which WADA monitors in order to detect
patterns of misuse in sports) [4].
There is ample laboratory based documentation which supports the
hypothesis that caffeine increases both strength [5, 6] and endurance performance [7, 8], but not all [9, 10], of the research
reported. However, variability in experimental design, dosage, mode of
administration and subject selection makes interpretation of these
results difficult. In spite of substantial documentation supporting
caffeine’s ergogenic effects on performance, there remains paucity of
conclusive evidence regarding the effect of caffeine on both strength
and endurance.
The purpose of the research is threefold Primary Objective: To test the
hypothesis that relative to placebo caffeine (5mg/kg BW) would exert an
ergogenic effect on maximal force production and endurance of human
quadriceps muscle (PART A); On cardio-respiratory endurance performance
(VO2max) (PART B) and; Secondary
Objective: To determine the urinary
caffeine concentration post-exercise in order to observe whether 5mg/kg
BW caffeine consumption can lead to positive dope test limit of
12μg/ml (PART C).
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
SUBJECTS
31
(17 male and 14 female) apparently healthy university students with
sedentary lifestyle (mean weight 63.0±2.9 kg, height
166.80±9.84 and age 24±2.25) reporting caffeine intake of
≤200 mg/week participated in the study [11]. Prior
caffeine habits were also taken into consideration, as acute and
habitual intake of caffeine causes diminished rise in epinephrine [12] and dampening of up-regulation of adenosine
receptors, respectively. However, these responses get potentiated after
4 days of withdrawal. All subjects abstained from caffeinated
substances for a minimum of 5 days prior to each experimental trial.
Subjects were weighed in minimal clothing, using a digital load cell
balance (Soehnle, West Germany), which has precision of 0.1 kg. The
height of the subjects were recorded, without footwear using a
vertically mobile scale (Holtain, Crymych UK) and expressed to nearest
0.1 cm. Each subject read and signed an informed consent document
outlining the experimental protocol and potential risks of the study.
The study was approved by the local medical ethical committee.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SUBJECTS
The
subjects were asked to refrain from any strenuous activity before the
test. Pre-structured standardized diet was given before each testing
protocol to maintain almost identical glycogen concentration in muscles
and liver cells.
PRE-EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL
Subjects were familiarized with both the equipments and the test
procedures itself to minimize anxiety. All the tests were performed
under similar environmental condition (21-240C, 45-55 %
relative humidity) and were free of significant external distraction.
Part A:
The HUR 5340 Leg Extension/Curl computer controlled machine was used
for evaluating the isometric angle specific peak force, average force
and fatigue index. Each subject visited the laboratory before the start
of the actual study and performed 2 maximum voluntary isometric
contractions with 10 second and 60 second hold on the dynamometer with
a rest period of 2 minute in between the two contractions, to determine
peak force (PF), average force (AVF) and fatigue index (FI) of the
quadriceps muscle of the dominant leg measured at optimal standardized
angle of knee joint (for which the quadriceps muscle applies maximal
torque i.e. 60° of knee flexion; 0° means full knee extension)
after Norkin et al. [13]. These constituted the
baseline readings of the control trial.
Part B:
Each subject performed an incremental VO2max test (Ramp 20
Protocol) on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (Corival
Lode, Gronigen, The Netherlands) [14]. Expired gas
samples were analyzed every 15 seconds for fractions of O2
and CO2 with an online system (Computer controlled Vista
Turbo Trainer machine, Vacumed, CA, U.S.A, Software – Turbofit version
– 5.04) and pedal cadence was kept between 60-85 rpm (revolutions per
minute) to determine the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and
maximal power output (Wattage maximum, Wmax). The test was
ended when pedaling frequency was lower than 50 rpm. On subsequent day
the subjects pedaled at their respective workload 65 % peak VO2
until exhaustion (maximal endurance test) and time to exhaustion Tlim
(minutes) was measured which constituted the baseline readings of Tlim
of the control trial [15].
EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL
The study utilized a pre test-post test repeated measure, experimental
design with control, placebo and caffeine trials completed in a random
order on 3 separate days, with 1 week interval in between all 3 tests
and with constant time and day of the week for each individual. Besides
a placebo that contained all purpose flour and no caffeine (0 mg/kg
BW), the dosage of caffeine tested was 5 mg/kg BW. Placebo and
standardized caffeine capsules were administered using a double blind
procedure in which an individual who was involved in neither data
collection nor analysis placed capsules in code envelopes, which were
identified by the subject’s initials and the day they were to be used.
US Pharmacopoeia grade caffeine (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, USA) was
used in the study.
Subjects were asked to consume food 2 hours prior to the test. After
capsule ingestion the subjects rested for one hour. The caffeine trials
were performed 1 hour post caffeine ingestion as peak concentrations
are evident one hour post ingestion [16].
PART A:
Following a 5 min warm-up for the quadriceps, the PF, AVF and FI were
measured at optimal standardized angle of the knee joint using the
isometric test protocol as per standardized procedure mentioned by HUR
research line software user manual (Version 1.3).
PART B:
Following unloaded pedaling on cycle ergometer for 2 minutes the
subjects pedaled until exhaustion at workload 65 % peak VO2
(maximal endurance test) to measure Tlim among the caffeine
and placebo trials.
PART C:
Randomly 12 subjects were selected and were instructed to give urine
samples immediately before and at 1st hr, 2nd hr and 6th hr
postexercise to evaluate the urinary caffeine concentration following
caffeine ingestion. Urine samples were immediately stored at -200C
in liquid nitrogen until further analysis. Caffeine concentration in
urine was determined using High Performance Liquid Chromatography
(HPLC) method (Hewlett Packard 1100 series, The Dope Control Centre,
Sports Authority of India, ISO/IEC 17025:1999) [8, 17].
ANALYSIS: ISOMETRIC STRENGTH MEASUREMENT
The
torque (Nm) was measured at 10 second isometric hold at 600
knee flexion for quadriceps in all the 3 groups. It was normalized to
force (N) by dividing the torque (Nm) by lever arm length (m).
Thereafter, Peak Force (PF) and Average Force (AVF) for 10 second were
calculated (AVF of 4 quarters; 1 quarter=2.5 sec).
ISOMETRIC ENDURANCE MEASUREMENT
After 2 minute rest with no activity, fatigue index (FI) was calculated
as a measure of isometric endurance with the same seat position and
knee angle as above. Isometric hold of 60 second was performed, to
calculate isometric endurance. Torque in 1st sec (T1) and
torque at 60th sec (T60) were observed. Torque T1
and T60 was normalized to force F1 and F60
respectively. Fatigue Index designed by Milner and Brown et al. [18] was calculated using the formula:
Fatigue – index = (F1 – F60)/F1
x 100 (%)
No visual or auditory cues were given to subjects to prevent
psychological abrasions.
TIME TO EXHAUSTION (MINUTES)
Time to exhaustion (minutes): After one minute rest, sitting on the
cycle ergometer the test was started with unloaded pedaling for 2
minutes then workload was kept constant at 65% peak VO2 (ml-1.kg-1.min-1)
respectively for each subject until exhaustion [7, 14]. Tlim was measured among the caffeine
and placebo trials.
DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICS
Data were presented as Mean ±
SD. The data were analyzed for
statistical significance by using the statistical package for social
sciences (SPSS 14.0) software. The dependent variables PF, AVF, FI and
Tlim were analyzed using one way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) for
statistical analysis of the control, placebo and caffeine trials. Since
significant differences were found (p<0.05) multiple comparison
Scheffe’s (Post Hoc Test) was applied to test for differences between
control, placebo and caffeine trials.
RESULTS
Isometric strength (PF and AVF) was
examined by a 10 second isometric hold of the dominant quadriceps
femoris muscle. One Way ANOVA showed a non-significant increment in
peak force (F=2.580, p=0.082). When intra-groups comparison was done
caffeine trial demonstrated a non-significant increase of 22.41%
(p=0.144) and 17.91% (p=0.144) as compared with control and placebo
respectively, as shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE
1
Distribution of Mean values of Peak Force with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine

Note: you may need
to resize your browser window for better view of Figure 1
Analogous
inferences can be drawn with One Way ANOVA when the average force was
taken into consideration, with (F=2.811, p=0.066). When intra-groups
comparison was done caffeine trial demonstrated a non-significant
increase of 25.53% (p=0.089) and 20.90% (p=0.192) as compared with
control and placebo respectively, as shown in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2
Distribution of Mean values of Average Force with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine

Note: you may need
to resize your browser window for better view of Figure 2
The fatigue index was examined by a 60
second isometric hold of the
dominant quadriceps femoris muscle. One Way ANOVA demonstrated
significant results with respect to fatigue index (F=5.580, p=0.005).
There was a highly significant decrease in fatigue index by 36.95%
(p=0.033) and 41.23% (p=0.011) when caffeine trial was compared with
control and placebo respectively (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3
Distribution of Mean values of Fatigue index with 5 mg/kg BW Caffeine

Note: you may need
to resize your browser window for better view of Figures
Time to exhaustion (Tlim) differed
significantly among the caffeine and
placebo tests. The endurance performance demonstrated stimulating
effect of caffeine on cycling time (min) (F=13.188, p=0.001) with an
increase of 49.47% and 45.53% as compared with caffeine trial and
placebo, respectively implying that caffeine at dose of 5mg/kgBW of
caffeine is capable of enhancing cycling endurance performance (Figure
4).
FIGURE 4
Distribution of Mean values of Time to Exhaustion with 5 mg/kg BW
Caffeine 

Note: you may need
to resize your browser window for better view of Figures
After intake of 5 mg/kg BW caffeine, the levels of caffeine in urine
were observed below 12 μg/ml for each subject, with the mean urinary
caffeine concentration immediately before and at 1st, 2nd and 6th hour
postexercise were equivalent to 0, 2.80±2.21, 4.79±2.11
and 3.55±2.57 (μg/ml) respectively, (Figure 5).
FIGURE 5
Distribution of Mean values of Urinary Caffeine concentration following
5 mg/kg BW Caffeine ingestion

Note: you may need
to resize your browser window for better view of Figures
DISCUSSION
The present research was conducted to examine whether
caffeine has ergogenic effect on performance variables of strength and
endurance as previous studies had demonstrated equivocal results. From
the present study it can be inferred that caffeine (5 mg/kg BW) has an
ergogenic effect on isometric muscular endurance and cardio-vascular
endurance but not on maximal force generating capacity of the human
quadriceps muscle.
EFFECT OF CAFFEINE ON ISOMETRIC
STRENGTH
Examining the effect of 5 mg/kg BW caffeine on peak force and average
force results indicate that caffeine lead to a non-significant increase
in both peak force and average force. Hence, it can be inferred that
caffeine causes non-significant increments in isometric strength
performance. Our results replicate previous findings by Bond et al. [19] who demonstrated non-significant differences in
measures of peak torque and power at the varying contracting velocities
following 5 mg/kg BW caffeine. James et al. [20]
also demonstrated that treatment with 70 μM caffeine had no significant
effect on force, work or power output of the Extensor Digitorum Longus
(EDL) or soleus muscles. Further, Bugyi [21]
suggested that maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was not affected by
the administration of caffeine. Furthermore, James et al. [20] and Williams et al. [22]
investigated effect of 7 mg/kg BW of caffeine and found no significant
effect on force output. On the contrary, Plaskett and Cafarelli [23] reported significant increase in force output
following ingestion of 6 mg/kg BW of caffeine.
The non-significant increase in isometric strength can be attributed to
following three mechanisms which have been postulated as possible
explanation of the potential ergogenic effects of caffeine on isometric
strength at the cellular level:
(a) Caffeine mobilizes and
increases release of intracellular Ca2+ from sarcolpasmic
recticulum24, 25, but since plasma concentrations of caffeine must be
very high for Ca2+ translocation to be observed in situ, it
is unlikely that this mechanism is solely responsible for the
physiological effects of caffeine;
(b) Inhibition of
phosphodiesterase by caffeine leading to a subsequent increase in
cyclic-3’,5’-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the various body tissues
[26, 27] however, this only
occurs when plasma caffeine concentrations reach pharmacological
millimolar (mM) ranges that are toxic to humans and;
(c) The antagonistic effect of
caffeine at adenosine receptors (which, inhibits neurotransmitter
release primarily dopamine and acetylcholine, depresses spontaneous and
evoked potentials and decreases neuronal firing rates [28],
mainly in the CNS thus increasing descending drive from the motor
cortex, consequently increasing a subject’s ability to excite a motor
unit pool.
EFFECT OF CAFFEINE ON ISOMETRIC
ENDURANCE
The study also investigated effects of caffeine on Isometric endurance
and statistically significant ergogenic effect of caffeine on fatigue
was observed for the caffeine trial. The findings of our study are in
consistence with the findings of Meyers and Cafarelli [29]
who demonstrated that caffeine ingestion (6 mg/kg) significantly
increases time to fatigue during submaximal isometric contractions (50
% maximal voluntary contractions of human quadriceps). They observed
that caffeine increases the time to fatigue by effecting calcium
reuptake and maintaining twitch force and not by altering the firing
rates during submaximal isometric contractions. James et al. [20] reported significant increase in Force, work,
and power output during shortening after treatment with 10 mM caffeine
on isolated mouse extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus muscles in
vitro during recovery from fatigue. Plaskett and Cafarelli [23] reported that 6mg/kg BW caffeine increased
endurance of submaximal isometric contractions of the quadriceps and
inferred that since caffeine did increase the ability to activate motor
units voluntarily, it appears that the increase in excitability occurs
supraspinally. Also, Kalmer and Cafarelli [30]
investigating the effect of 6 mg/kg BW caffeine on muscular endurance
found that fatigue was significantly delayed in submaximal contractions
of quadriceps and suggested that caffeine increases maximal voluntary
activation at a supraspinal level enabling subjects to produce maximal
voluntary output with maximal effort. On the contrary, Williams et al. [31] found that handgrip did not increase after the
administration of 7 mg/kg BW caffeine. Lopes et al. [32]
found that three off their five subjects non-significantly increased
endurance time of sustained contraction of adductor pollicis after
ingestion of 500 mg of caffeine; reporting a mean increase in endurance
time of 12 % in the caffeine trial.
Possible explanations for these findings was attributed to caffeine’s
adenosine-receptor antagonism, which may increase the firing rates of
central neurons, but the study conducted Kalmer and Cafarelli [30] failed to demonstrate any significant
alterations in firing rates of motor units recorded during submaximal
voluntary contractions of quadriceps following 6 mg/kg BW caffeine
administration. Release of Ca2+ from sarcolpasmic recticulum
[33, 34] and inhibition of
calcium uptake by sarcolpasmic recticulum
could possibly explain caffeine’s ergogenic effect on muscular
endurance. Direct effects of caffeine on muscle include potentiating
the tension of isolated muscle contraction by direct stimulation, both
at rest and after fatigue [35, 36,
37]. Caffeine also increases
production of plasma catecholamines that allow the body to adapt to the
stress as a result of physical exercise [38, 39] and also increase the
availability of free fatty acids as muscle substrates during work, thus
allowing glycogen sparing [40]. Caffeine by
attenuating exercise
sensory processes enhance isometric endurance performance [33, 41] and
a hypoalgesic effect of caffeine has been observed during ischaemic
muscle contraction [42] which too may contribute
to delay of fatigue
(perception of discomfort during fatigue).
EFFECT OF CAFFEINE ON
CARDIO-RESPIRATORY
ENDURANCE
In the present study caffeine trial, time to exhaustion demonstrated a
significant increase of 49.47 % and 45.53 % as compared with control
and placebo trials, respectively implying that caffeine at dose of
5 mg/kgBW of caffeine is capable of enhancing cycling endurance
performance. Study by Graham and Spriet [43]
reported increase in
endurance time after 9 mg/kg BW caffeine ingestion during running.
Additionally, Cole [39] found that 6 mg/kg BW
caffeine significantly
increased total work performed during the caffeine trials in comparison
with placebo trials suggesting that caffeine may play an ergogenic role
in exercise performance by altering both neural perception of effort
and substrate availability. Improvement in performance after absorption
of caffeine observed in prolonged exercise involving aerobic metabolism
has been attributed to stimulation of lipolysis. Hydrolysis of
triglycerides of adipose tissue increases blood concentration of free
fatty acids [42]. Furthermore, the increase in
endurance performance
after caffeine ingestion is thought to be caused by enhanced fat
oxidation41 which delays glycogen depletion and fatigue. A simultaneous
down regulation of carbohydrate metabolism could result in glycogen
sparing which was also demonstrated by Spriet and coworkers [43].
URINE CAFFEINE CONCENTRATION
The results of the present study demonstrate that the urine caffeine
concentration following ingestion of 5 mg/kg BW caffeine observed at
1st
hour, 2nd hour and 6th hour post-exercise were well below the caffeine
dope limit of 12 µg/ml for all the 12 subjects sampled. This is
in agreement with the study conducted by Pasman et al. [8]
who reported
that the mean urinary concentration for the 5 mg/kg BW dose was
4.8±1.8 µg/ml, 15 minutes after finishing the cycling
exercise. The differences in the time (post-capsule ingestion) at which
the samples are collected might affect the amount of caffeine being
measured in urine. Acute and chronic exercise has been reported to
alter pharmacokinetics of caffeine. However, it has been observed that
sports activity does not seem to have any consequence on the
absorption, distribution, metabolism and urinary elimination of
caffeine [45].
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, caffeine exerts an ergogenic effect only on isometric
muscle endurance and cardio-respiratory endurance but has no effect on
maximum voluntary isometric strength. The peak force, average force
increased by 17.91 % and 20.90 % respectively, but this was not
statistically significant. Fatigue index decreased (implying that time
to exhaustion increased) significantly by 41.23 % and 45.53 % for the
(5 mg/kgBW) caffeine trial in comparison with placebo. Also, urine
caffeine concentrations remained well below the caffeine dope limit of
12 μg/ml. Based on the present study it is concluded that athletes
should take not more than 2-3 cups of coffee an hour before the
competition to benefit from the ergogenic effect of caffeine on both
isometric as well as cardio-respiratory endurance during endurance
events.
REFERENCES
Please
note: web enhanced references below provide no registration free
access
to documents
1. Arnaud MJ (1987). The
pharmacology of caffeine. Prog Drug Res 31: 273-313 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
2. Griffiths RR, Juliano LM,
Chausmer A. (2003). Caffeine: Pharmacology and Clinical Effects. In:
Graham AW, Schultz TK, Mayo-Smith MF, Ries RK, Wilford BB, editors.
Principles of Addiction Medicine. 3. American Society of Addiction
Medicine; pp. 193–224 [ Back2Text
].
3. Bigland-Ritchie B, Furbush F,
Woods JJ. (1986). Fatigue of intermittent submaximal voluntary
contractions: central and peripheral factors. J Appl Physiol 61 (2):
421-429 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
4. World Anti Doping Agency.
The world anti doping code. The monitoring program. 2009 [ URL
][ Back2Text ].
5. Woolf K, Bidwell WK, Carlson AG. (2008). The
effect of caffeine as an ergogenic aid in anaerobic exercise. Int J
Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. Aug; 18(4):412-29 [
PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
6. Sharma A, Sandhu JS. (2008).
The effect of different dosages of caffeine on isometric strength &
isometric endurance. Journal of Exercise Physiology online. 11(6):
34–43
[ .DOC
][ Back2Text ].
7. Laurent D, Schneider KE,
Prusaczyk WK, Franklin C, Vogel SM, Krssak M, Petersen KF, Goforth HW,
Shulman GI. (2000). Effects of caffeine on muscle glycogen utilization
and the neuroendocrine axis during exercise. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab.;85:2170–75 [ .PDF
][ Back2Text ].
8. Pasman
WJ, van Baak MA, Jeukendrup AE, De Haan A. (1995). The effect of
different dosages of caffeine on endurance performance time. Int J
Sports Med 16(4): 225-230 [
PubMed ][ Back2Text ]
9. Hunter AM, St Clair Gibson
A, Collins M, Lambert M, Noakes TD. (2002). Caffeine ingestion does not
alter performance during a 100-km cycling time-trial performance. Int J
Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. Dec;12(4):438-52 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
10. Perkins R, Williams MH.
(1975). Effect of caffeine upon maximal muscular endurance of females.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 7(3): 221-224
[ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
11. Kalmar JM, Cafarelli E.
(1999). Effects of caffeine on neuromuscular function. J Appl Physiol.
87:801–808
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
12. Bangsbo J, Jacobsen K,
Nordberg N, Christensen NJ, Graham T. (1992). Acute and habitual
caffeine ingestion and metabolic responses to steady state exercise. J
Appl Physiol 72 (4): 1297-1303
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
13. Norkin CC, Levangie PK.
Joint Structure and function. A comprehensive analysis. 3rd Edition.
F.A. Davis Company. pp 351. (Book) [ Back2Text ].
14. Davis JA, Cohipp BJ, Lamarran, Huntsman DJ,
Frank MH and Wasserman. (1982). Effect of ramp slope on measurement of
aerobic parameters from the ramp exercise test. Med Sci Sports Exerc
1982; 14: 339-343 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
15. Hogervorst E, Bandelow S, Schmitt J, Jentjens R,
Oliveira M, Allgrove J, Carter T, Gleeson M. (2008). Caffeine improves
physical and cognitive performance during exhaustive exercise. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 40:1841–1851 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
16. Harland B. (2000) Caffeine
and nutrition. Nutrition.;16:522–526 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
17. Abu-Qare AW, Abou-Donia MB.
(2001). A validated HPLC method for the determination of pyridostigmine
bromide, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid and caffeine in rat plasma
and urine. J Pharm Biomed Anal. Dec; 26(5-6):939-947 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
18. Milner-Brown HS, Mellenthin,
M. and Miller R. G. (1986). Quantifying human muscle strength,
endurance and fatigue. Arch Phy Med Rehabil 67 (8): 530-535 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
19. Bond V, Gresham K, MacRae
J, Tearney R J (1986). Caffeine ingestion and isokinetic strength. Br J
Sports Med 20(3): 135-137 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
20. James RS, Wilson RS, Askew GN. (2004).
Effects of caffeine on mouse skeletal muscle power output during
recovery from fatigue. J Appl Physiol 96 (2): 545-552 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
21. Bugyi GJ. (1980). The
effects of moderate doses of caffeine on fatigue parameters of the
flexor forearm muscles. Am Correct Ther J 34 (2): 49-53.
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
22. Williams JH, Signorile JF,
Barnes WS, Henrich TW. (1988). Caffeine, maximal power output and
fatigue. Br J Sports Med 22(4): 132-134
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
23. Plaskett CJ and Cafarelli E.
(2001). Caffeine increases endurance and attenuates force sensation
during submaximal isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 91(4):
1535-1544 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
24. Binachi P. (1975). Cellular pharmacology of
contraction of skeletal muscle. In: Cellular pharmacology of excitable
tissues, Charles, C. T., Springfield, 485-519 [
PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
25. Stephenson GD, Williams DA. (1981). Calcium
activated force responses in fast- and slow- twitch skinned muscle
fibers of the rat at different temperatures. J Physiol 317: 281-302 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
26. Butcher RW, Sutherland EW.
(1962). Adenosine 3’-5’-monophosphate in biological materials. I:
Purification and properties of 3’-5’-nucleotide phosphodiestrase and
the use of this enzyme to characterize adenosine 3’-5’-phosphate in
human urine. J Biol Chem 237: 1244-1250 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
27. Beavo JA, Rogers NL,
Crofford OB, Hardmen JG, Sutherland EW, Newman EV. (1970). Effect of
xanthine derivatives on lipolysis and on adenosine 3,5-monophosphate
phosphodiesterase activity. Molec Pharmacol 6:597-603 [ URL
][ Back2Text ].
28. Nehlig A, Daval JL, Debry G.
(1992). Caffeine and the central nervous system: mechanisms of action,
biochemical, metabolic and psychostimulant effects. Brain Res Brain Res
Rev 17(2): 139-170 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
29. Meyers BM, Cafarelli E.
(2005). Caffeine increases time to fatigue by maintaining force and not
by altering firing rates during submaximal isometric contractions. J
Appl Physiol 99(3): 1056-1063 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
30. Williams JH, Barnes WS, Gadberry WL.
(1987). Influence of caffeine on force and EMG in rested and fatigued
muscle. Am J Phys Med 66(4): 169-183 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
31. Lopes JM, Aubier M, Jardim
J, Aranda JV, Macklem PT. (1983). Effect of caffeine on skeletal muscle
function before and after fatigue. J Appl Physiol 54(5): 1303-1305
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
32. Binachi P. (1961). The
effect of caffeine on radio calcium movement in frog sartorious. J Gen
Physiology 44: 845-858
[ URL
][ Back2Text ].
33. Fryer MW, Neering IR.
(1989). Actions of caffeine on fast and slow twitch muscles of the rat.
J Physiol 416: 435-454 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
34. Connett RJ, Ugol LM, Hammack MJ, Hayes ET.
(1983). Twitch potentiation and caffeine contractures in isolated rat
soleus muscle. Comp Biochem Physiol 74(2): 349-354 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
35. Varagic VM, Zugic M. (1971). Interactions of
xanthine derivatives, catecholamines and glucose-6-phosphate on the
isolated phrenic nerve diaphragm preparation of the rat. Pharmacology
5(2): 275-286 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
36. Yamaguchi T. (1975).
Caffeine induced potentiation of twitches in frog single muscle fiber.
Jpn J Physiol 25(6): 693-704 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
37. Essig D, Costill DL, Van
Handel PJ. (1980). Effects of caffeine ingestion on utilization of
muscle glycogen and lipid during leg ergometer cycling. Int J Sports
Med 1, 86-90.
As cited by: Pasman et al., 1995. The effect of different dosages of
caffeine on endurance performance time. Int J Sports Med, Vol. 16, No.
4, 225-230 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text
].
38. Fisher SM, McMurray RG,
Berry M, Mar MH, Forsythe WA. (1986). Influence of caffeine on exercise
performance in habitual caffeine users. Int J Sports Med 7 (5): 276-280
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
39. Mazzeo RS. (1991).
Catecholamine responses to acute and chronic exercise. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 23: 839-845 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
40. Cole KJ, Costill DL, Starling RD,
Goodpaster BH, Trappe SW, Fink WJ. (1996). Effects of caffeine
ingestion on perception of effort and subsequent work production. Int J
Sports Nutr 6 (1): 14-23 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
41. Myers DE, Shaikh Z, Zullo
TG. (1997). Hypoalgesic effect of caffeine in experimental ischaemic
muscle contractions. Headache 31: 654-658
[ URL
][ Back2Text ].
42. Graham TE, Spriet LL.
(1991). Performance and metabolic responses to a high caffeine dose
during prolonged exercise. J Appl Physiol 71(6):2292-8
[ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
43. Bellet S, Kershbaum A, Finck
EM. (1968). Response of free fatty acids to coffee and caffeine.
Metabolism 17 (8): 702-707 [ PubMed
][ Back2Text ].
44. Spriet
LL, MacLean DA, Dyck DJ, Hultman E, Cederblad G, Graham TE. (1992).
Caffeine ingestion and muscle metabolism during prolonged exercise in
humans. Am J Physiol 262: E891-E898 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
45. Van der Merwe PJ, Luus HG, Barnard JG. (1992).
Caffeine in sport: Influence of endurance exercise on the urinary
caffeine concentration. Int J Sports Med; 13: 74-76 [ PubMed ][ Back2Text ].
CLICK
HERE OR PRESS <CTRL><D> TO BOOKMARK THIS ARTICLE |
|
| This
article should be cited in the following way:
S. Archna, S.S.
Jaspal. Effects of caffeine ingestion on strength and endurance
performance of normal young adults. The Doping
Journal
Vol. 7, 2 (2010) Available at: http://dopingjournal.org/content/7/2/
( Please make sure you
included
article web address in your citation! )
|
Copyright©
2010+ by The
Doping Journal (ISSN 1812-948x)
Learn
why Doping Journal serves AdWords
ads by Google, and how one can be of help